On July 3, 1997, the BC Federation of Labour made a submission to the Royal Commission, outlining the views of our members regarding the need for new health and safety legislation, and changes to Workers' Compensation benefits for the survivors of workers killed by occupational accidents and diseases. The following summary outlines the main proposals made by the Federation. If you are interested in obtaining a full copy of the submission, please contact the Federation Office.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

British Columbia Federation of Labour
Submission to the

Royal Commission On Workers’ Compensation in British Columbia

British Columbia’s public policies regarding occupational health and safety, and survivor’s benefits are outdated, and need to be renewed, based on current knowledge and societal views.

The British Columbia Federation of Labour submission to the Royal Commission recommends two key priorities for the Royal Commission:

The Federation’s submission outlines legislative steps necessary to achieve these goals. The Federation’s proposals are based on twenty years of consultation with individual workers, unions, other worker health organizations, academics, and staff of the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Occupational Health and Safety Legislation For The 21st Century

a) The Federation’s key recommendations for amending the Act to express the responsibility and accountability of the Workers’ Compensation Board include:

b) The Federation’s key recommendations for amending the Act to ensure health and safety regulations are kept up to date with the rapid changes in technology, work practices and scientific knowledge occurring today include:

c) The Federation’s key recommendations for dealing with the numerous public bodies responsible for worker health and safety include:

d) The Federation’s key recommendations for protecting young workers include:

e) The Federation’s key recommendations for the issue of individual responsibility of workers, employers and suppliers include specifying respective responsibilities in the legislation.

f) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding the right of workers to know about the risks they face and how to work safely, include:

g) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding the right of workers to act to protect their own health and safety include:

h) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding the right of workers to participate in workplace prevention programs include:

i) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding medical programs to protect worker health include:

j) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding improvements to British Columbia’s workplace health and safety infrastructure include:

k) The Federation’s key recommendations regarding incentives and sanctions for prevention include:

l) In regard to the investigation of work-related fatalities, the Federation submission recommends that Coroner Inquests be undertaken at the request of a surviving family or union representing the workers at the workplace where the fatality occurred.

Compensation In Fatal Cases

The key recommendations of the Federation regarding changes in benefits for surviving families of workers who have died from work-related causes include:





INJURED WORKERS HUMAN RIGHTS GROUP
OF
BRITISH COLUMBIA

Injured Workers in British Columbia working hand in hand for fairness and justice

Lower Mainland Chapter
#17-10880-152nd Street Surrey, B.C. V3R 4H4
Phone: (604) 584-3736 Fax: (604) 583-8576
E-mail me at slund@direct.ca

January 28, 1997

The Royal Commission into The Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia
Suite 1440 625 Howe Street Vancouver , B.C. V6C 2T6
PH:(604)660-0130 Fax:(604)660-0199 Toll Free 1-800-552-0312

RE: Submissions to the Royal Commission on the Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia

In answer to your request for input into how we as citizens, and interested parties envision the process of the Royal Commission to ensure that parties will be heard, our organization would like to respond as follows with some suggestions.

Accessibility is the key question and we see that this has three important ingredients that will ensure that all people have access to your commission in order to effectively allow you to complete your mandate.

LOCATION:

With the vast distances that are part of the terrain of our province and the population distribution it is important to note that an open mind be maintained as to the parameters you chose to dictate your travel to satellite hearings into WCB. All claimants have a right to "SAY" what they feel but may not have access to transportation.

We also have the problems of weather to contend with. The bulk of this start-up process will begin during the most challenging time of the year to get around our province.

BUDGET:

Along with location, funding to coordinators should be made available to assist claimants during the hearings.

NOTICE:

The people of this province also require as much advance notice as possible that a hearing will take place in their community.

These three very broad points have very different ways in which a solution may be found to solve any one of them.

Our group suggests that an OPEN MIND and a utilization of the resources already available in the province dictate how and when you handle the submission and hearing processes.

Various groups around the province have special experience in accessing those claimants who, by the nature of their disability or other factors, may not be able to travel at all. Their input is very important on this issue.

We also suggest that public notice that all media forms of submissions will be accepted. The use of home video, electronic mail and audio cassette could greatly assist those claimants wanting to be heard.

Assistance with photocopying and fax facilities as well as postage will allow these notices and submissions to have a greater chance of being effective.

Utilizing the 75 current MLA’s locations as a starting point and some budgeting from the Royal Commission made available in order that the constituency offices have those resources. Various groups and interested parties would have no problems in assisting the constituency offices with this task and would give those people a true feeling of participation in the process.

We also want to assist your team in getting the most from these participants. In our experience it is advantageous to have someone that people relate to and can understand the hurt that they sometimes feel.

Throughout the province various organizations that specialize in advocacy of injured workers would make themselves available to assist you in this manner. The costs of this assistance would be modest and the effectiveness of the participation would enhance the outcome of the Royal Commission.

These are just some of the ideas we feel will assist you in directing the Royal Commissions process towards an effective and successful conclusion, but we wish to reiterate that these are not the only mechanisms available. Please be flexible and allow for the surprises that will invariably arise when asking for input on a subject as important as this.

As your investigation goes forth, expand the area to which you can look for answers, we are sure that it will surprise you once you hear the stories of the actions that we know desperately needs to be investigated and brought to light during this Royal Commission.

On behalf of the Injured Workers Human Rights Group of British Columbia.


Birgit Lund, President
Injured Workers Human Rights Group
of
British Columbia